Al-Anfal 58: If you fear treason from a nation (with whom you have made a covenant), inform them that you also broke (the covenant with them) similarly. Allah does not like traitors.

To Surah Al-Anfal, verse 58, we had come. If you fear treachery from a people you made a treaty with, then you too, that you have likewise broken the pledge you made with them, inform them. For Allah does not love the treacherous, it says. If we pay attention to this verse too, this one too has been explained incompletely. That is, it's not possible for them to explain it.

To explain, it's not possible for them to explain the verses. Normally there is nothing. Well, would a prophet, wary of the harm a people might do to him, break his pledge? There is no actual deed at hand. No actual deed. In this case, wouldn't he be committing an injustice?

The verse cannot be explained. But normally they put the prophet, too, into the guise of an ordinary person, so that a human, but that meaning, they put him into that capacity. I suspect Hulusi, Ahmet, Mehmet. Even though he may be thinking in my favor, I break off my dealings with him.

Would that be right now? Look what Allah Almighty says. And they give Him attributes. If you fear treachery from a people you made a treaty with, you too, inform them that you have likewise broken the pledge you made with them, it says. If you fear they commit treachery, it says.

Not "if you fear treachery", but when you catch, in hand, the evidence of those committing treachery against you, it says; when you catch its evidence, that becomes your evidence, so that then about them you can give your decision in this way.

Without its evidence you can in no way break your pledge. This does not befit Islam. It especially doesn't befit a prophet. What would the man say? Weren't you Allah's Messenger? Have you suffered any harm from me? Look, have you suffered any harm from me? You break your pledge. If he said, what kind of prophet are you, what would you say? There, the verse is right there; isn't it like that? Look, I'm reading it once more. If you fear treachery from a people you made a treaty with: I fear that Hulusi will betray me. Pardon? You too, that you have likewise broken the pledge you made with them, inform them, it says.

Yes. I feared him, (?), that he would betray me: friend, what I made with you I truly don't recognize. I'll say, I mean. Well, if he rises up and says to me: you are Allah's prophet. You don't commit injustice; when he says that, isn't this now injustice? Is it like this? You are Allah's messenger. Is your Allah like this? If he said that, what answer would you give?

No, I'm asking, what answer will you give? There, they cannot explain the verses. These verses are not explained like this. Allah is always given attributes in this case, and then they say, who are you, do you know Arabic? Well, go ahead: you have a mind, a mind, you have a mind; do you never use your minds, says Allah Almighty. In the verse, to the word pay attention: We send every prophet with the language of his own people, He says. Allah Almighty sent me too with your language.

He sent me with the Turkish language. Now use your mind. Learn the right and the crooked here. Use your mind.

Knowing Arabic is not a requirement. When it's translated, I know whether it is Allah's word or not. I also know that human (?) has been slipped into it.

Yes. So, "if you fear treachery from a people you made a treaty with": it is not this. When they commit treachery, when you have the evidence in hand, the pledge you made with them, it says, inform them that you have likewise broken it. Friend, I made a pact with you, but you betrayed me behind my back. There you go, he says. Now I have broken my pledge with you, he says. Let me show you the counterpart of this verse, the event in the time of the Prophet, shall I? The counterpart of this verse. At the Aqaba treaty they make a treaty, they make a pledge, but the disbeliever comes and slaughters Muslims in Medina.

In a meeting, the Prophet immediately sends word. I have broken my pledge, he says.

Yes. Then he marches on Mecca.

The explanation of this verse, at its root, has to be like this. My own words don't express it, so that I could explain it. But I am telling you the way it will be.

Yes. If, in a treaty made with peoples, the sincerity of the treaty made with them cannot be trusted, and treachery is feared from these peoples, then with them you may break the treaty according to the evidence in your hand. And in this broken treaty, the other side is informed.

Informing the other side that the treaty has been broken means: Islam does not lie, does not strike anyone from behind, and nothing is, unannounced and without warning, with anyone broken. There you go.

How beautiful. We explain it here. Yes. Since non-Muslims are anyway in enmity toward Allah and Islam, any opening given to them is used as a trump card in their hands, and everywhere, showing enmity to Allah, against Islam, to turn people away from Islam, the fire of fitna they light. If you break the treaty without cause, that's how they light the fire of fitna.

From this too they light the fire of fitna.

Therefore a Muslim cannot fail to keep his word like a non-Muslim. He cannot play double. He cannot be slippery. A Muslim. The character of Islam is like this.

People who break their pledge, who play double, who are slippery, are treacherous people. Well, now if you break the pledge out of the blue, won't you fall into this state? Yes. And Allah does not love the treacherous. Even if these traits are found in Islam too, in Islam too, in this respect, so that the Muslims are not deprived of Allah's love, Allah, so that Muslims do not commit errors, and in a way that gives non-Muslims too life, guides with His verses and calls to the truth. How so? Allah Almighty tells the truth to both sides. How beautiful, He makes the events known. Compare this verse with other commentaries, let's see.

Just this verse. What (?) there are, what talk there is, what (?) there are. Because he doesn't know the meaning of the verse. He keeps making things up off the top of his head.